Francais | English | Espanõl

Beast of Gévaudan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
<tr><td colspan="2" style="text-align: center;">Image:Gevaudan-monster2.png</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" style="text-align: center;">The Beast of Gévaudan,
as depicted in a contemporary drawing</td></tr>
Beast of Gévaudan
Classification

<tr><th style="text-align: left;">Grouping:</th><td>Unknown carnivore</td></tr>

Statistics

<tr><th style="text-align: left;">Also Known As:</th><td>La bête du Gévaudan (French)</td></tr> <tr><th style="text-align: left;">Country:</th><td>France</td></tr> <tr><th style="text-align: left;">Region:</th><td>Gévaudan (Modern day Lozère)</td></tr> <tr><th style="text-align: left;">First Reported:</th><td>1764</td></tr> <tr><th style="text-align: left;">Last Sighted:</th><td>1767</td></tr>

<tr><th style="text-align: left;">Status:</th><td>Legend</td></tr>


The Beast of Gévaudan (French: La bête du Gévaudan) was a legendary wolf like creature that terrorised the former province of Gévaudan (modern day Lozère département), in the Margeride Mountains in south-central France from about 1764 to 1767. Many attacks took place, killing between 60-100 people, and debate continues as to the Beast's true identity. <ref name=clark1>Clark, Jerome (1993). Unexplained! 347 Strange Sightings, Incredible Occurrences, and Puzzling Physical Phenomena. Detroit: Visible Ink Press. ISBN 0810394367.</ref> The story is a popular subject for cryptozoologists and conspiracy theorists.

Contents

[edit] Appearance

The Beast was described as being a wolflike creature the size of a cow, with a wide chest, a long sinuous tail with a lion-like tuft of fur on the end, and a greyhound-like head with small straight ears and large protruding fangs. The creature was said to have red fur, and a peculiar white stripe that ran down the length of its chest. The sole survivor of the attack, a young peasant girl, described it: "It was as large as a cow, with claws the size of a man's hand." <ref name=clark1/>

It may have been able to leap up to thirty feet, according to analysis of some of its tracks.

[edit] Attacks

The first attack that provided a description of the creature took place in May/June of 1764. A girl from Langogne was working a farm in the Forêt de Mercoire when she saw a large, wolf-like animal emerge from the trees and charge directly toward her, but it was driven away by the farm's bulls.

The creature's reported method of killing was unusual for a predator, often targeting the head, and ignoring the usual areas targeted by predators, including the legs and throat. Often the head was crushed or removed. It also seemed to target people over farm animals, reportedly having an aversion to cattle; many times it would attack someone while cattle were in the same field.

There were some reports that the beast was seen with another such animal, or with young; others state that the beast was with a man.

Some accounts put the number of dead at fifteen women, sixty-eight children, and six men (figures of those dead, another 30 wounded or mauled). The Beast's preference towards women and children is perhaps due to their working the country-side farms in pairs or even alone, making themselves easier targets. Men, however, tended to have objects that could be used as weapons, such as sickles, and often worked the fields in large groups.

[edit] The hunt for the beast

On January 12 1765, Jacques Portefaix and six friends were attacked by the Beast; they drove it away by staying grouped together. Their fight caught the attention of King Louis XV, who awarded 300 livres to the men. The King then directed professional wolf-hunters, Jean-Charles-Marc-Antoine Vaumesle d'Enneval and his son Jean-François, to kill the beast.

They arrived in Clermont-Ferrand on February 17 1765, bringing them eight bloodhounds which had been trained in wolf-hunting. They spent several months hunting wolves by night (although most of the attacks were at dawn or dusk), believing them to be the beast. However the attacks continued, and by June 1765 they were replaced by François Antoine (AKA Antoine de Beauterne), the king's harquebus bearer and chief huntsman, and who held the title of Great Louvetier (wolf hunter) of the realm. He arrived in le Malzieu on June 22.

On September 21 1765, Antoine killed a big gray wolf measuring 80 cm high, 1.7 m long, and weighing 60 kg. The wolf was called 'Le Loup de Chazes,' after the nearby Abbaye des Chazes. It was agreed locally that this was quite large for a wolf. Antoine officially stated: "We declare by the present report signed from our hand, we never saw a big wolf that could be compared to this one. Which is why we estimate this could be the fearsome beast that caused so much damage."

The wolf was stuffed and sent to Versailles where Antoine was received as a hero, receiving a large sum of money as well as lands, titles and awards.

However, on December 2 1765, the Beast attacked again in la Besseyre Saint Mary, severely injuring two children. Dozens more deaths are reported to have followed.

[edit] Jean Chastel

The killing of the creature that eventually marked the end of the attacks is credited to a local hunter, Jean Chastel, at the Sogne d'Auvers.

Controversy surrounds Chastel's account of his success. He claimed that, when part of a large hunting party, he sat down to read the Bible and pray. During one of the prayers the creature came into sight, staring at Chastel, who finished his prayer before shooting the beast. This would have been aberrant behaviour for the beast, as it would usually attack on sight. Some believe this is proof Chastel participated with the beast, or that even he had trained it. However, he may simply have invented the story of the prayer out of religious motives.

[edit] Explanations

Various explanations were offered at the time of the attacks. They ranged from exaggerated accounts of wolf attacks, to a loup-garou (werewolf) <ref name=clark1/> all the way to the beast being a punishment from God, or perhaps an unholy creature summoned by a sorcerer.

Current opinions offer up the theory that the attacks were actually a serial killer, or group of serial killers, using wolf attacks to cover their own murders. Also sometimes mentioned are the theories that the beast may have been a Dire Wolf,[1] a marginally larger, extinct relative of modern wolves; as well as the theory that the animal may have simply been an escaped captive exotic animal such as a hyena or lion.

Yet another theory is that the creature was a specially bred wolfdog hybrid used for hunting, such as those bred and used by the Spanish in the 16th century.

Certain cryptozoologists believe that it may have been a mesonychid, while other individuals may think it is a creodont. However, it has not been explained how it would have survived until the 18th century without detection.

Some believe it to be a Thylacine (also called the Tasmanian Tiger), though it is said this extinct (last verified specimen died in 1936) animal could not have been strong or vicious enough for the job. Also Australia had only just become known to Europeans, and it would have been impossible for a thylacine to have survived until 1765 even if Abel Tasman, the only European visitor thus far, had brought one back.

[edit] In the arts and popular culture

For this was the land of the ever-memorable BEAST, the Napoleon Bonaparte of wolves. What a career was his! He lived ten months at free quarters in Gévaudan and Vivarais; he ate women and children and ‘shepherdesses celebrated for their beauty’; he pursued armed horsemen; he has been seen at broad noonday chasing a post-chaise and outrider along the king’s high-road, and chaise and outrider fleeing before him at the gallop. He was placarded like a political offender, and ten thousand francs were offered for his head. And yet, when he was shot and sent to Versailles, behold! a common wolf, and even small for that.
  • The legend surrounding the attacks spawned a movie, Brotherhood of the Wolf (2001), which, while based on the records of the creature, also took several creative liberties in order to make the story more entertaining. Generating positive reviews and record business, it is primarily fictional.
  • A barely more accurate version of the historic events was shown in the TV-film La bête du Gévaudan, France 2003, first aired by the station ARTE in 2005, directed by Patrick Volson.
  • The creature was subject of an episode of 'Animal-X.'

[edit] References

<references/>

[edit] External links

<span class="FA" id="no" style="display:none;" /> <span class="FA" id="nn" style="display:none;" />

de:Bestie von Gévaudan es:Bestia de Gévaudan fr:Bête du Gévaudan gl:Bestia do Gévaudan it:Bestia dello Gévaudan no:Beistet i Gévaudan nn:Beistet i Gévaudan pl:Bestia z Gévaudan

Personal tools