Francais | English | Espanõl

Dacian language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Dacian
Spoken in: Romania, Moldova, parts of Ukraine, Hungary, Serbia, and Northern Bulgaria
Language extinction: probably by the 6th century AD
Language family: Indo-European
 Dacian
Language codes
ISO 639-1: none
ISO 639-2: ine
ISO/FDIS 639-3: xdc 
Indo-European
Indo-European languages
Albanian | Anatolian | Armenian
Baltic | Celtic | Dacian | Germanic
Greek | Indo-Iranian | Italic | Phrygian
Slavic | Thracian | Tocharian
Indo-European peoples
Albanians | Anatolians | Armenians
Balts | Celts | Germanic peoples
Greeks | Indo-Aryans | Indo-Iranians | Iranians
Italic peoples | Slavs | Thracians | Tocharians
Proto-Indo-Europeans
Language | Society | Religion
Urheimat hypotheses
Kurgan hypothesis | Anatolia
Armenia | India | PCT
Indo-European studies

The Dacian language was an Indo-European language spoken by the ancient people of Dacia. It is often considered to have been a northern variant of the Thracian language or closely related to it.

Many of the characteristics of the Dacian language are unknown and disputed. There are almost no written documents in Dacian. What is known of the language derives from:

Contents

[edit] Geographic distribution

Dacian used to be one of the major languages of South-Eastern Europe, stretching from what is now Eastern Hungary to the Black Sea shore. Based on archaeological findings, the origins of the Dacian culture are believed to be in Moldavia, being identified as an evolution of the Iron Age Basarabi culture.

[edit] Sound changes from PIE

Dacian was a Satem language. For details of its sound changes, see Proto-Indo-European to Dacian sound changes.

[edit] Affiliation

In the 1950s, the Bulgarian linguist Vladimir Georgiev published his work<ref name="Georgiev">Georgiev, Raporturi..."</ref> which demonstrated that the phonology of the Dacian language is close to the phonology of Albanian, further supporting the theory that Dacian was on the same language branch as the Albanian language, a language branch termed Daco-Moesian (or Daco-Mysian), Moesian (or Mysian) being thought of as a transitional dialect between Dacian and Thracian.

There are cognates between Daco-Thracian and Albanian which may be evidence of the Daco-Thracian-Albanian language affinity, and many substratum words in Romanian have Albanian cognates.

Ancient Greek geographer Strabo claimed that the Getae spoke the same language as the Thracians.<ref>Strabo, "Geographica" Book VII, Chapter 3, 10</ref> However, Georgiev argued that Dacian and Thracian are two different languages, with two different phonetic systems, his idea being supported by the placenames, which end in -dava in Dacian and Moesian, as opposed to -para, in Thracian placenames.<ref name="Georgiev"/>

[edit] Extinction

It is unclear exactly when the Dacian language became extinct, or even whether it has a living descendant. The initial Roman conquest of part of Dacia did not put an end to the language, as Free Dacian tribes such as the Carpi may have continued to speak Dacian in Moldavia and adjacent regions as late as the 6th or 7th century AD, still capable of leaving some influences in the forming Slavic languages.

I. According to one hypothesis, a branch of Dacian continued as the Albanian language (Hasdeu, 1901);

II. Another hypothesis considers Albanian to be a Daco-Moesian Dialect that split off from Dacian before 300 BC and that Dacian itself became extinct; The argument for this early split (before 300BC) is the following: inherited Albanian words (Ex: Alb. motër 'sister' < Late IE ma:ter 'mother') shows the transformation Late IE /a:/ > Alb /o/, but all the Latin loans in Albanian having an /a:/ shows Latin a: > Alb a. This indicates that the transformation PAlb /a:/ > PAlb /o/ happened and ended before the Roman arrival in the Balkans. On the other hand, Romanian substratum words shared with Albanian show a Romanian /a/ that correspond to an Albanian /o/ when both sounds source is an original Common /a:/ (mazãre/modhull<*ma:dzula 'pea'; raţã/rosë<*ra:tya: 'duck') indicating that when these words have had the same Common form in Pre-Romanian and Proto-Albanian the transformation PAlb /a:/ > PAlb /o/ had not started yet. The correlation between these two facts indicates that the split between Pre-Romanian(the Dacians that were later Romanized) and Proto-Albanian happened before the Roman arrival in the Balkans.

III. Another hypothesis connects Albanian not with Dacian, but with the Illyrian languages.

[edit] Dacian as the substratum of Proto-Romanian

The Dacian language may form the substratum of the Proto-Romanian language, which developed from the Vulgar Latin spoken in the Balkans north of the Jirecek line that roughly divides Latin influence from Greek influence.

Whether Dacian in fact forms the substratum of Proto-Romanian is disputed (see Origin of Romanians), yet this theory does not rely on the Romanization having occurred in Dacia, as Dacian was also spoken in Moesia, and as far south as northern Dardania. About 300 words in Eastern Romance (Romanian, Aromanian, Megleno-Romanian, Istro-Romanian) may derive from Dacian, and many of these show a satem-reflex, as one would expect in Daco-Thracian words (see Eastern Romance substratum).

[edit] See also

[edit] Notes

<references/>

[edit] References

  • I. I. Russu, Limba traco-dacilor, Bucharest, Editura Ştiinţifică, 1967
  • Vladimir Georgiev (Gheorghiev), Raporturile dintre limbile dacă, tracă şi frigiană, "Studii Clasice" Journal, II, 1960, 39-58

[edit] External links

el:Δακική γλώσσα es:Idioma dacio it:Daco he:דאקית nl:Dacisch pl:Język dacki pt:Língua dácia ro:Limba dacă sk:Dáčtina fi:Daakian kieli

Personal tools