Francais | English | Espanõl

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Home education, also called homeschooling or home school, is the education of children at home rather than in an institution such as a public or private school. Prior to the introduction of compulsory school attendance laws in the 19th century, most education worldwide occurred within the family or community, with only a small proportion of the population attending schools or employing tutors.

The terms homeschooling or home education may refer to instruction in the home under the supervision of correspondence schools or umbrella schools. A curriculum-free philosophy of homeschooling may be called unschooling, a term coined in 1977 by American educator John Holt in his magazine Growing Without Schooling.

Especially in the English-speaking nations, homeschooling can be an option for parents who wish to provide their children with a quality of education or social environment which they believe is unattainable in schools. At present, most children are institutionally schooled.

Contents 1 History of homeschooling 1.1 Rise of compulsory education 1.2 Beginning of the modern homeschool movement: John Holt 1.3 Beginning of the modern homeschool movement: Ray & Dorothy Moore 2 Homeschooling demographics 2.1 Australia 2.2 Canada 2.3 Republic of Ireland 2.4 United Kingdom 2.5 United States 2.6 New Zealand 3 Motivations to homeschool 3.1 Unique family needs 3.2 Socialization 3.3 Miscellaneous 4 Homeschooling methodology 4.1 Mathematics 4.2 Unit studies 4.3 Special materials 4.4 All-in-one curricula 4.5 Student-paced learning 4.6 Community resources 4.7 Unschooling 5 Cost to homeschooling families 6 Criticism of homeschooling 7 Legality of homeschooling 8 Research results 8.1 Academic findings 8.2 Social findings 9 References 10 See also 11 External links

[edit] History of homeschooling

[edit] Rise of compulsory education

The earliest compulsory schooling in the West began in the late 17th century and early 18th century in the German states of Gotha, Heidelheim, Calemberg and, particularly, Prussia.<ref name="Mises">http://www.mises.org/story/2226</ref> In the United States, the first state to issue a compulsory education law was Massachusetts, in 1789,<ref name="Mises"/> but not until 1852 did the state establish a "true comprehensive statewide, modern system of compulsory schooling."<ref name="Mises"/> During this time period it was usual for parents in most of the U.S. to utilize books dedicated to home education such as Fireside Education, Griswold, 1828, or Warren Burton's Helps to Education In The Homes Of Our Country<ref>http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/pageviewer?frames=1&coll=moa&view=50&root=%2Fmoa%2Fnora%2Fnora0097%2F&tif=00586.TIF&cite=http%3A%2F%2Fcdl.library.cornell.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmoa%2Fmoa-cgi%3Fnotisid%3DABQ7578-0097-84</ref>, 1863, sometimes bolstered by the services of local or itinerant teachers, as means and opportunity allowed.<ref name="BHHS">http://www.hsc.org/professionals/briefhistory</ref> The United States has been asserted to have been at the height of its national literacy during this period under this informal system of tutelage, using books like these and the popular McGuffey Readers.<ref>Dr. Raymond Moore, Home Grown Kids, 1981</ref> After the establishment of the Massachusetts system, other states and localities began to make school attendance mandatory, but even by 1912 A.A. Berle of Tufts University, later delegate to the Paris Peace Conference, asserted in his book The School in Your Home that the previous twenty years of mass education had been a failure and that he had been asked by hundreds of parents about how they could teach their children at home.<ref name="BHHS"/>

[edit] Beginning of the modern homeschool movement: John Holt

In the early 1970s the premises and efficacy of compulsory schooling came into question with the publication of books like Deschooling Society by Ivan Illich, 1970, and No More Public School by Harold Bennet, 1972. These ideas and his own experiences in teaching developed in the mind of John Holt to produce, in 1976, Instead of Education: Ways To Help People Do Things Better. Holt's 1964 book How Children Fail, and 1967 follow-up How Children Learn, had created such a firestorm of controversy as to catapult him to public attention, to the extent of making appearances on major TV talk shows, writing book reviews for Life magazine, and having been a guest on the To Tell The Truth TV game show (trying to determine the real author of How Children Learn).<ref>The Old Schoolhouse Meets Up With Patrick Farenga About the Legacy of John Holt , http://www.thehomeschoolmagazine.com/How_To_Homeschool/articles/articles.php?aid=97</ref> At the end of Instead of Education Holt had called for an "underground railroad" for children to escape traditional compulsory schooling.<ref>The Old Schoolhouse Meets Up With Patrick Farenga About the Legacy of John Holt , http://www.thehomeschoolmagazine.com/How_To_Homeschool/articles/articles.php?aid=97</ref> After the book's publication Holt was contacted by families from various parts of the country to tell him that they had taken the almost unheard of step of educating their own children at home, usually illegally, and from this point Holt began producing a magazine dedicated to homeschooling, Growing Without Schooling.<ref name="BHHS"/> A former WWII submariner and self-made education reformer with no professional training in education, Holt's basic philosophy about education was very simple, even organic: "Basically...the human animal is a learning animal; we like to learn; we are good at it; we don't need to be shown how or made to do it. What kills the processes are the people interfering with it or trying to regulate it or control it."[1] It was no great leap from there to arrive at homeschooling, and Holt later said in 1980, "I want to make it clear that I don’t see homeschooling as some kind of answer to badness of schools. I think that the home is the proper base for the exploration of the world which we call learning or education. Home would be the best base no matter how good the schools were."[2] Holt only ever wrote one book actually about homeschooling, per se, Teach Your Own, 1981, and continued to hope for more expansive unschooling type reform within education as a whole until his death in 1985.

[edit] Beginning of the modern homeschool movement: Ray & Dorothy Moore

Almost simultaneously, in the late 1960s and early 1970s, career educational professionals Ray and Dorothy Moore began to question and then to research the validity of Early Childhood Education. This research included requesting independent studies by other researchers and a massive review of over 8000 studies bearing on Early Childhood Education and the physical and mental development of children. Surprisingly, this research/analysis brought the Moores to the conclusion that the introduction of children to formal schooling prior to age 8 to 12 was not only lacking in its expected effectiveness, but actually damaging to children, with the greatest toll exacted on boys due to their well documented lag in maturity compared to girls. The Moores began to publish their findings that formal schooling was damaging to young children academically, socially, mentally, and even physiologically. In their writings they presented evidence to demonstrate that childhood problems from juvenile delinquency to nearsightedness to increased enrollment of students in "special education" classes and behavioral problems in the schools and at home were the result of increasingly earlier enrollment of students into schools.<ref>Better Late Than Early, Raymond S. Moore, Dorothy N. Moore, Seventh Printing, 1993</ref> The Moores even cited studies demonstrating that retarded teenagers acting as surrogate mothers and illiterate tribal mothers in Africa produced children who were socially and emotionally more advanced than typical western children, by western standards of measurement. <ref>Better Late Than Early, Raymond S. Moore, Dorothy N. Moore, Seventh Printing, 1993</ref> The key assertion made by the Moores was that the bonds and emotional development made at home with parents during these years produced critical long term results in children that were cut short by enrollment into schools and could not be replaced or corrected in an institutional setting afterward.<ref>Better Late Than Early, Raymond S. Moore, Dorothy N. Moore, Seventh Printing, 1993</ref> While recognizing the necessity of early care for some children – particularly special needs and starkly impoverished children, and children from exceptionally inferior homes – the Moores maintained that the research demonstrates the vast majority of children are far better situated at home with mediocre parents than with even the most gifted and motivated teachers in a school setting, describing the difference this way,"This is like saying, if you can help a child by taking him off the cold street and housing him in a warm tent, then warm tents should be provided for all children – when obviously most children already have even more secure housing."<ref>Better Late Than Early, Raymond S. Moore, Dorothy N. Moore, 1975</ref>

Similar to Holt, the Moores also embraced homeschooling after the publication of their first work, Better Late Than Early, 1975 and went on to become important homeschool advocates and pioneers with the publication of books like Home Grown Kids, 1981, and Home Spun Schools, Home Style Teaching, Home Made Health, Home Built Discipline, Home School Burnout, and Minding Your Own Business.<ref name="BHHS"/><ref>Better Late Than Early, Raymond S. Moore, Dorothy N. Moore, Seventh Printing, 1993</ref>

One common theme running through the homeschool philosophies of both Holt and the Moores is that homeschooling isn't (or shouldn't) be an attempt to bring the "school" construct into the home, or a viewing of education as a compartment of a larger life, but rather a profound, rather holistic, shift in paradigm in which all members of the family, even from a very young age, are involved with one another in industrious and gainful enterprises to benefit the individual and the whole family, educating themselves and one another through these experiences of living.

[edit] Homeschooling demographics

[edit] Australia

The Australian census does not track homeschooling families, but Philip Strange of Home Education Association, Inc. very roughly estimates 15,000.<ref>http://www.hea.asn.au/hea/resources/disp_res.asp?type=4&id=60</ref> In 1995, Roland Meighan of Nottingham School of Education estimated some 20,000 families homeschooling in Australia. <ref name="EdOtherwise">Home-based%20education%20effectiveness</ref>

[edit] Canada

Meighan estimated the total number of homeschoolers in Canada, in 1995, to be 10,000 official and 20,000 unofficial.<ref name="EdOtherwise"/>

Karl M. Bunday estimated in 1995, based on journalistic reports, that in Canada as a whole about 1 percent of school-age children were homeschooled.<ref>http://learninfreedom.org/homeschool_growth.html</ref>

As of April 2005, the total number of registered homeschool students in British Columbia appears to be 3,068.<ref>http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/home_school/</ref>

In Manitoba, homeschoolers are required to register with Manitoba Education, Citizenship and Youth, the department that regulates schooling in the Province. The number of homeschoolers is noted at over 1,500 or just 0.5% of students enrolled in the public system.<ref>http://www.edu.gov.mb.ca/k12/specedu/indsch/home_sch.html</ref>

[edit] Republic of Ireland

An estimated 250-350 children are officially registered as being educated in their home in the Republic of Ireland, however Ireland's National Education Welfare Board estimates that there may be as many as 1500 - 2000 more who are not registered.<ref>http://www.homeschool-ireland.com/newb-letter.php</ref> The right to a home education is enshrined in the constitution of Ireland.

[edit] United Kingdom

One home-education advocate estimates there are 50,000 children "home-educated" in the United Kingdom.<ref>http://www.home-education.org.uk/</ref>

Meighan's 1995 estimate for the UK was "almost 10,000"<ref name="EdOtherwise"/>, and in 1996 the London Evening Standard stated that 15,000 families home-educating in Britain was a 50 percent increase from the previous year.<ref>http://learninfreedom.org/sidlifBritainhmsc.html</ref>

[edit] United States

According to U.S. Dept of Education report NCES 2003-42, "Homeschooling in the United States: 2003"<ref name="NCES">http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/homeschool/index.asp</ref>, there was an increase in homeschooled students overall in the U.S. from 850,000 students in 1999 (1.7 percent of the total U.S. student population) to 1.1 million students in 2003 (2.2 percent of the total U.S. student population).

During this time, homeschooling rates increased among students whose parents have high school or lower education, from 2.0 to 2.7 percent among White students; 1.6 to 2.4 percent among student in grades 6-8; and 0.7 to 1.4 percent among students with only one parent.

Race and ethnicity ratios remained "fairly consistent" in this time period, with 2.7 percent of White students homeschooling, 1.3 percent of Black students, and 0.7 percent of Hispanic students.

As in 1999, homeschooling rates were highest in families with three or more children (3.1 percent), and higher in families with two children (1.5 percent) than only one child (1.4 percent). Not surprisingly, there were more homeschool students from families with two parents (2.5 percent) than only one parent (1.5 percent), and students from two parent families where only one parent worked were more than twice as likely to be homeschooled (5.6 percent).

By 2001, according to the Canadian based Fraser Institute, Muslim Americans were the fastest growing subgroup in the homeschool movement, and were predicted to double in number every year for the following eight years after.<ref>http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/admin/books/files/homeschool.pdf</ref>

Due to what they percieve as the godlessness of the secular school system 70% of homeschooled children in the United States are Evangelical Christians <ref>http://pewforum.org/news/display.php?NewsID=4741</ref>

[edit] New Zealand

Karl M. Bunday cites the New Zealand TV program "Sixty Minutes" (unrelated to the U.S. program), as stating in 1996 that there were 7,000 school-age children in New Zealand being homeschooled.<ref>http://learninfreedom.org/sidlifBritainhmsc.html</ref> Philip Strange of the Australian Home Education Association Inc. quotes "5274 registered home educated students in 3001 families" in 1998 from the New Zealand Ministry of Education.<ref>http://www.hea.asn.au/hea/resources/disp_res.asp?type=4&id=60</ref>

[edit] Motivations to homeschool

According to a 2003 U.S. Census survey, 33% of homeschooling households cited religion as a factor in their choice. The same study found that 30% felt the regular school had a poor learning environment, 14% objected to what the school teaches, 11% felt their children weren't being challenged at school, and 9% cited morality. <ref>http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0053.html</ref>

According to the U.S. DOE's "Homeschooling in the United States: 2003", 85 percent of homeschooling parents cited "the social environments of other forms of schooling" (including safety, drugs, bullying and negative peer-pressure) as an important reason why they homeschooled their children. 72 percent cited their "desire to provide religious or moral instruction" as an important reason, and 68 percent cited "dissatisfaction with academic instruction at other schools."<ref name="NCES"/> 7 percent of parents cited "Child has physical or mental health problem" as a reason they homeschool, another 7 percent cited "Child has other special needs" and 9 percent cited "Other reasons" (including "child's choice," "allows parents more control of learning" and "flexibility").<ref name="NCES"/>

[edit] Unique family needs

Other reasons include the allowance of more flexibility in adapting educational practices for children with learning disabilities or illnesses, or for children of missionaries, military people, or otherwise traveling parents. Homeschooling also is sometimes opted for when a child has a significant career hobby, such as acting, circus performance, dancing or violin.

[edit] Socialization

Some families feel that the negative social pressures of schools, such as premature sexualization, bullying, drugs, school violence, and other school-related problems, are detrimental to a child's development. Some such advocates believe that the family unit, not same-age peers, should be the primary vehicle for socialization.

[edit] Miscellaneous

• Providing a legal option for families who wish to abstain from mandatory immunizations.
• Providing consistency in education for families that travel or move frequently.
• Providing accelerated study toward early entrance into middle school, high school, or college.

[edit] Homeschooling methodology

There is a wide variety of home education methods and materials. Home education families may adopt a particular educational philosophy such as:

• Classical education (including Trivium, Quadrivium)
• Waldorf education
• Charlotte Mason education
• Theory of multiple intelligences
• Montessori method

Other parents and children use a broad combination of ideas or allow the child to develop their own interests or selection of subjects and/or learning methods. This is usually termed unschooling.

For sources of curricula and books, "Homeschooling in the United States: 2003"<ref name="NCES"/> found that 78 percent of homeschool parents utilized "a public library"; 77 percent used "a homeschooling catalog, publisher, or individual specialist"; 68 percent used "retail bookstore or other store"; 60 percent used "an education publisher that was not affiliated with homeschooling." "Approximately half" used curriculum or books from "a homeschooling organization", 37 percent from a "church, synagogue or other religious institution" and 23 percent from "their local public school or district." 41 percent of homeschoolers in 2003 utilized some sort of distance learning. Approximately 20 percent by way of "television, video or radio"; 19 percent via "Internet, e-mail, or the World Wide Web"; and 15 percent taking a "correspondence course by mail designed specifically for homeschoolers."

Because home education laws vary widely according to individual government statutes, official curriculum requirements vary.<ref name="HSLDA">http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/default.asp</ref>

[edit] Mathematics

Standards-based mathematics curricula (sometimes referred to as fuzzy math or no-math math) are designed for school districts. Homeschooling options may include Saxon math, Singapore Math, Math U See, and Modern Curriculum Press. Math games, math-based literature, and computer software can be used to supplement a math curriculum.

[edit] Unit studies

The unit study method incorporates several subjects – such as art, history, math, science, geography and Bible or theology – around the context of one topical theme – like water, animals, American slavery, or ancient Rome.[3] For example, a unit study of Native Americans could combine age-appropriate lessons in: social studies, like how different tribes live now, and lived prior to colonization; art, such as making Native American clothing; history (of Native Americans in the U.S.); reading from a special reading list; and the science of plants used by Native Americans. The following unit-study subject could change to some other broad topic of study.

Unit study advocates assert that children retain 45% more information following this approach.<ref>http://www.thehomeschoolmom.com/teacherslounge/styles/unitstudymethod.php</ref>

[edit] Special materials

Special materials focus on skill-building. Individual subject materials usually consist of workbooks, sometimes with textbooks, and an instructional guide. Many specialized subjects are only available in this form. Special materials are frequently used for math and primary reading.

[edit] All-in-one curricula

"All-in-one" curricula, sometimes called "school in a box", are comprehensive packages covering many subjects, usually an entire year's worth. They contain all needed books and materials, including pencils and writing paper. Most such curricula were developed for isolated families who lack access to public schools, libraries and shops, or are overseas.

These materials typically recreate the school environment in the home, and are typically based on the same subject-area expectations as publicly run schools, allowing an easy transition into school if desired. They are among the most expensive options for the home-educated, but are easy to use and require minimal preparation. The instructional guides are usually extensive, with step-by-step instructions. These programs may include standardized tests, and remote examinations to yield an accredited privately run school diploma.

[edit] Student-paced learning

Similar to All-in-one curricula are learner paced curriculum packages. Oftentimes called paces, these workbooks allow the student to progress at an individualized speed. Prices vary widely depending upon the publisher.

[edit] Community resources

Home educators take advantage of educational programs at museums, community centers, athletic clubs, after-school programs, churches, science preserves, parks, and other community resources. Secondary school level students often take classes at community colleges, which typically have open admission policies.

[edit] Unschooling

"Unschooling" is a term that can be used with two distinct meanings.

Some use the term "unschooling" to describe methods of education that do not resemble instructional schools. These people are primarily indicating that they do not use textbooks and/or do not spend much time at desks. The parents definitely are in charge of the children's education and they may use a variety of resources.

The term "unschooling," as coined by John Holt indicates that the parents do not authoritatively direct the child's education, but interact with the child following the child's own interests, leaving them free to explore and grow and learn as they wish.<ref>http://www.bloomington.in.us/~learn/Holt.htm</ref><ref>http://www.naturalchild.org/guest/marlene_bumgarner.html</ref> Holt's "unschooling" assumption was that children learn directly through the experience of living, and encourages parents to live their lives with their child. Also known as interest-led or child-led learning, unschooling attempts to provide opportunities through real life where a child will learn without coercion. An unschooled child may choose to use texts or classroom instruction, but it is never considered central to education. Holt's unschooling philosophy included the inherent assumption that there actually is no specific body of knowledge that is, or should be, required of a child.<ref>http://www.naturalchild.org/guest/marlene_bumgarner.html, see footnote 1.</ref>

Advocates for unschooling claim that children learn best by learning from doing. For example, a child may learn reading and math skills from playing card games, better spelling and other writing skills because he's inspired to write a science fiction story for publication, or local history by following a zoning or historical-status dispute. While proponents of other homeschooling philosophies may also use these methods, "unschoolers" will allow the child to initiate these learning activities instead of imposing them upon him.

The term "unschooling" is distinct from "deschooling," which may be used to indicate an anti-"institutional school" philosophy, or a period or form of deprogramming for children or parents who have previously been schooled.

[edit] Cost to homeschooling families

Home education may have a financial impact on families in addition to purchasing school supplies and curriculum materials, as one of the parents (typically the mother) usually refrains from employment outside the home in order to supervise the child's education. Some compensate by running a business as a family, working from home, or enlisting the help of friends or relatives during the hours in which the adults are working. According to one Businessweek study, however, a second income outside the home is at least as likely to be a financial drain on the family as a benefit, especially in younger families with children.<ref>http://www.businessweek.com/1997/34/b3541213.htm</ref>

The tangible costs associated with homeschooling would seem to be as variable as the reasons to homeschool or the philosophical approaches to homeschooling. Scholastic Achievement and Demographic Characteristics of Home School Students in 1998, Lawrence M. Rudner, Table 2.12, tracked expenditures that ran from less than $200 per student, to greater than $2000.<ref>Scholastic Achievement and Demographic Characteristics of Home School Students in 1998, Lawrence M. Rudner, University of Maryland, College Park http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n8/</ref>

Notably, the three most populous catagories of expenditure level in this study were the bottom three tiers: students in the $200 or less category were the third most populous, with 17.9% of all homeschool students in the study. 21.5% of students were in the range of $400-$599, but the largest single category, at 33.8%, were in the $200-399 range. Only 2% of homeschool students lived in households that spent $2000 and over; the top 5 categories combined – ranging from $600 to $2000 and over per student – amount to 25.1% of the total. All of these levels are well below the national average expenditure for public school students, which in 1998 was up to $6200-$6500 per student.<ref>http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=66</ref> Indeed, the majority utilized less than 10% of public school expenditures.

The study also indicates a clear relationship between the amount of money spent on homeschool students and the academic achievements of those students.

[edit] Criticism of homeschooling

Opposition to home education comes from varied sources, including organizations of teachers and school districts. One example is the National Education Association, a teachers' union, which is the largest labor union in the United States.<ref>http://www.nea.org/aboutnea/about.html?origref=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Education_Association&alias=http://www.nea.org/aboutnea/index.html</ref> They are on record as opposing homeschooling outright, though in recent years they have not been as outspoken in this opposition. Opponents state concerns falling into several broad categories, including: academic quality and completeness, reduced government money for the publicly run schools, socialization of children with peers of different ethnic and religious backgrounds, and fear of religious or social extremism. Gallup polls of American voters have shown a significant change in attitude in the last twenty years, from 73% opposed to home education in 1985 to 54% opposed in 2001.<ref>http://eric.uoregon.edu/trends_issues/choice/home_schooling.html</ref>

Opponents variously claim that home-educating parents are sheltering their children and denying them opportunities that are their children's right, reducing the amount of government funds publicly run schools would receive if more children were attending the publicly run school, or providing an unfair advantage to home-educated children over students whose parents lack the time or money for home education.

Some critics argue that while home-educated students generally do extremely well on standardized tests<ref>http://www.hslda.org/docs/nche/000010/200410250.asp</ref>, such students are a self-selected group whose parents care strongly about their education and would also do well in a conventional school environment.

[edit] Legality of homeschooling

Main article: Legality of homeschooling in the United States

Home education exists legally in many parts of the world. Countries with the most prevalent home education movements include the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand and Australia. Some countries have highly regulated home education programs which are actually an extension of the compulsory school system, while others have outlawed it entirely. In many other countries, while not restricted by law, home education is not socially acceptable or not considered desirable and, therefore, virtually non-existent.

In many countries where home education does not exist legally, underground movements flourish where children are kept out of the compulsory school system and educated at, sometimes considerable, risk. Still, in other countries, while the practice is illegal, the governments do not have the resources to police and prosecute offenders and, as such, it takes place largely in the open.

Home education in the United States is governed by each individual state and therefore regulations vary greatly from one state to another.

[edit] Research results

[edit] Academic findings

Some studies have suggested the academic integrity of home education programs, demonstrating that on average, home-educated students outperform their publicly run school peers by 30 to 37 percentile points across all subjects. Moreover, the performance gaps between minorities and gender that plague publicly run schools are virtually non-existent amongst home-educated students.<ref>http://www.hslda.org/docs/study/comp2001/default.asp</ref>

Home-educated student curricula often include many subjects not included in traditional curricula. Some colleges find this an advantage in creating a more academically diverse student body, and proponents argue this creates a more well-rounded and self-sufficient adult. Increasingly, colleges are recruiting home-educated students; many colleges accept equivalency diplomas as well as parent statements and portfolios of student work as admission criteria; others also require SATs or other standardized tests. Some opponents argue that home education curricula often exclude critical subjects and isolate the student from the rest of society, or presents them with their parents' ideological world views - especially religious ones - rather than the publicly sanctioned worldviews taught at state schools.

The results of home education with gifted and learning-disabled children have not been as thoroughly studied.

[edit] Social findings

In the 1970s career educators Dr. Raymond S. and Dorothy N. Moore conducted 4 federally funded analyses of more than 8,000 early childhood studies, from which they published their original findings in Better Late Than Early, 1975, and, because of which, eventually became important proponents of homeschooling. This was followed by School Can Wait, a repackaging of these same findings designed specifically for educational professionals.<ref>Better Late Than Early, Raymond S. Moore, Dorothy N. Moore, Seventh Printing, 1993, addendum</ref> This analysis concluded that, "where possible, children should be withheld from formal schooling until at least ages eight-ten," a conclusion clearly at odds with the majority thinking on the subject of education. The reason determined in the analysis for this conclusion is that children, particularly boys, are simply, and profoundly, "not mature enough for formal school programs until their senses, coordination, neurological development and cognition are ready." Moore concluded that the outcome of societal insistence on forcing children into the regimentation of formal schooling is a sequence, beginning with "1) uncertainty as the child leaves the family nest early for a less secure environment, 2) puzzlement at the new pressures and restrictions of the classroom, 3) frustration because unready learning tools — senses, cognition, brain hemispheres, coordination — cannot handle the regimentation of formal lessons and the pressures they bring, 4) hyperactivity growing out of nerves and jitter, from frustration, 5) failure which quite naturally flows from the four experiences above, and 6) delinquency which is failure’s twin and apparently for the same reason."<ref>http://www.moorefoundation.com/When%20Education%20Becomes%20Abuse.html</ref> According to the Moores, "early formal schooling is burning out our children. Teachers who attempt to cope with these youngsters also are burning out."<ref>http://www.moorefoundation.com/When%20Education%20Becomes%20Abuse.html</ref> Aside from damaging the academic performance of students, early formal schooling also actually destroys "positive sociability", encouraging peer dependence and discouraging self worth, optimism, respect for parents and trust in peers. This situation is particularly acute for boys because of their well documented delay in maturity. In sharp contrast, the Moore's cite a Smithsonian Report on genius which indicates a clear requirement for "1) much time spent with warm, responsive parents and other adults, 2) very little time spent with peers, and 3) a great deal of free exploration under parental guidance."<ref>http://www.moorefoundation.com/When%20Education%20Becomes%20Abuse.html</ref> The analysis suggests, among other things, that children need "more of home and less of formal school" "more free exploration with...parents, and fewer limits of classroom and books," and "more old fashioned chores – children working with parents – and less attention to rivalry sports and amusements."<ref>http://www.moorefoundation.com/When%20Education%20Becomes%20Abuse.html</ref>

In keeping with these findings, Taylor, using the Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale, later found that, "while half of the conventionally schooled children scored at or below the 50th percentile (in self-concept), only 10.3% of the home-schooling children did so."<ref>Self-Concept in home-schooling children, John Wesley Taylor V, Ph.D., Andrews University, Berrien Springs, MI</ref> His study further stated in summation that "the self-concept of home-schooling children is significantly higher (and very much so statistically) than that of children attending the conventional school. This of course has important implications in the areas of academic achievement and socialization, to mention only two. These two areas have been found to parallel self-concept very closely. Regarding socialization, it appears that very few home-schooling children are socially deprived. Critics who speak out against home schooling on the basis of social deprivation are actually addressing an area which favors home schoolers. Apparently, the research data indicates that it is the conventionally schooled child who is actually deprived."<ref>Self-Concept in home-schooling children, John Wesley Taylor V, Ph.D., Andrews University, Berrien Springs, MI</ref>

In 2003, the National Home Education Research Institute (NHERI) conducted a survey of over 7,300 U.S. adults who had been home-educated (over 5,000 for more than seven years). Their findings included:

• Home-educated graduates are active and involved in their communities. 71% participate in an ongoing community service activity, like coaching a sports team, volunteering at a school, or working with a church or neighborhood association, compared with 37% of U.S. adults of similar ages from a traditional education background.

• Home-educated graduates are more involved in civic affairs and vote in much higher percentages than their peers. For example, 76% of surveyed between the ages of 18 and 24 voted within the last five years, compared with only 29% of the relevant U.S. population. The numbers of home-educated graduates who vote are even greater in older age groups, with voting levels not falling below 95%, compared with a high of 53% for the corresponding U.S. populace.

• Of those adults who were home-educated, 58.9% report that they are "very happy" with life (compared with 27.6% for the general U.S. population). Moreover, 73.2% of homeschooled adults find life "exciting", compared with 47.3% of the general population.<ref>http://www.hslda.org/research/ray2003/</ref>

The Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), a U.S. government agency, has published multiple articles on home education. Here are excerpts from one which examined several studies on home-educated children socialization:

According to the findings, children who were educated at home "gained the necessary skills, knowledge, and attitudes needed to function in society...at a rate similar to that of conventionally schooled children."

and;

The researcher found no difference in the self concept of children in the two groups, and maintains that "insofar as self concept is a reflector of socialization, it would appear that few home-schooled children are socially deprived, and that there may be sufficient evidence to indicate that some home-schooled children have a higher self concept than conventionally schooled children."<ref>http://www.ericdigests.org/1995-1/home.htm</ref>

[edit] References

<references/>

[edit] See also

• Calvert School
• Home School Legal Defense Association
• Mary Pride

[edit] External links

• More information about Ivan Illich and his philosophy.
• A history of the modern homeschool movement, from the Cato Institute.
• Holt Associates Inc's website John Holt's writings and legacy, maintained by Patrick Farenga
• The official website of the Moore Foundation
• National Home Education Research Institute
• Home School Legal Defense Association
• Know Homeschooling Wiki
• Homeschooling A to Z A vast collection of home education info, articles, and links.
• Gifted Homeschoolers Forum A California-based national association for families homeschooling gifted children.
• Home Education UK - Contains links to UK, US, European and Australian home education organizations.
• IndigoExtra - provides information and links on home education in Europe.
• The Old Schoolhouse Magazine Large, diverse homeschooling magazines with international distribution.
• The Link Homeschool Newspaper Free, inclusive, national homeschool newspaper. Articles run the gamut of styles and philosophies.da:Hjemmeundervisning

de:Hausunterricht eo:Hejminstruo fr:Instruction à la maison he:חינוך ביתי nl:Thuisonderwijs ja:ホームスクーリング pl:Edukacja domowa pt:Ensino doméstico fi:Kotikoulu sv:Hemundervisning