Francais | English | Espanõl

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mary Wollstonecraft (April 27, 1759 – September 10, 1797) was a British writer, a philosopher, and an early feminist. A woman of letters, she wrote novels, treatises, a travel narrative, a history, a conduct book and a children's book, but is best known for her A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792).

In the latter, Wollstonecraft argued that what appeared to be the nature of woman was actually a consequence of the miseducation of women—a miseducation imposed on them by men. She also argued in favor of a social order based on reason and free of prejudice.

Wollstonecraft married the philosopher William Godwin, one of the forefathers of the anarchist movement, and was the mother of Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein.

Contents 1 Early Life 2 “The First of a New Genus” 3 France and Imlay 4 England and Godwin 5 Death and Godwin’s Memoirs 6 Works 6.1 Vindication of the Rights of Men (1790) 6.2 Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792) 7 Bibliography 8 Notes and references 9 Further reading 10 External links

[edit] Early Life

Mary Wollstonecraft was born on April 27, 1759 in Spitalfields. Although her family had a comfortable income while she was a young child, her father gradually wasted it on untenable speculations and projects, causing increasing instability within the family. He even forced Wollstonecraft to turn over money to him that she would have inherited at her maturity. Moreover, he appears to have been a violent man, beating his wife in drunken rages. As a teenager, Wollstonecraft used to lie outside the door of her mother’s bedroom to protect her.<ref>Todd, Janet. Mary Wollstonecraft: A Revolutionary Life. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson (2000), 11. ISBN 0231121849.</ref> Wollstonecraft also played this protective and at times smothering maternal role for her sisters, Everina and Eliza, throughout her life. In a dramatic and defining moment early in Wollstonecraft’s life, she convinced and helped her sister Eliza, who was suffering from what was probably post-partum depression, to flee from her husband and child in 1784. In this action, Wollstonecraft demonstrated early on that she was willing to challenge social norms but the human costs of her actions were that her sister was doomed to a life of social ostracism and her baby ultimately died.<ref>Todd, 45-57.</ref>

Wollstonecraft had a series of passionate early friendships that helped shape her early life. The first was with Jane Arden in Beverley. She writes to her “I have formed romantic notions of friendship . . . I am a little singular in my thoughts of love and friendship; I must have the first place or none."<ref>Todd, 16.</ref> The second and more important was with Fanny Blood. Wollstonecraft credits Fanny with opening her mind to new possibilities. Wollstonecraft, her two sisters Eliza and Everina, and Fanny set up a school together in Newington Green, a dissenting community, but it failed after Wollstonecraft abandoned it to look after Fanny. Fanny was engaged and after her husband took her to the continent to improve her health,<ref>Todd, 62.</ref> she became pregnant and her health worsened; Wollstonecraft followed in 1785 to nurse her.<ref>Todd, 68-9.</ref> Her death devastated Wollstonecraft and was part of inspiration for her first novel, Mary.

[edit] “The First of a New Genus”

After Fanny died and Wollstonecraft returned to England, she was employed as a governess for a year in the Irish Kingsborough family but she could not get along with Lady Kingsborough,<ref>See, for example, Todd, 106-7.</ref> although the children seem to have found her an inspiring instructor. Margaret King would later say she "had freed her mind from all superstitions."<ref>Todd, 116.</ref> Wollstonecraft would use what she learned during this experience to write her only children's book, Original Stories from Real Life, in 1788.<ref>For an excellent analysis of this text, see Mitzi Myers, "Impeccable Governesses, Rational Dames, and Moral Mothers: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Female Tradition in Georgian Children’s Books,” Children’s Literature 14 (1986): 31-59.</ref> The book would remain popular for the next half-century; a 1791 edition carried engravings by William Blake.<ref>Carpenter, Henry and Mari Prichard. 1984. The Oxford Companion to Children's Literature. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York. 588 pages. ISBN 0192115820. p 389</ref>

It was at this point that Wollstonecraft decided to embark on her career as an author. It was a truly radical decision since few women could support themselves by writing at the time. As she wrote to her sister Everina in 1787, she was trying to become “the first of a new genus.”<ref>Mary Wollstonecraft, The Collected Letters of Mary Wollstonecraft, Ed. Janet Todd (New York: Penguin, 2003), 139.</ref> She moved to London and, assisted by the liberal publisher Joseph Johnson, found a place to live and work to support her.<ref>Todd, 123</ref>. She translated texts (learning French and German to do so<ref>Todd, 134-5.</ref>), most notably Of the Importance of Religious Opinions by Jacques Necker and Elements of Morality, for the Use of Children by Christian Gotthilf Salzmann, and wrote reviews, mostly on novels, for the Analytical Review, a Johnson publication.<ref>For an analysis and a list of Wollstonecraft’s reviews, see Mitzi Myers, "Sensibility and the 'Walk of Reason': Mary Wollstonecraft’s Literary Reviews as Cultural Critique,” Sensibility in Transformation: Creative Resistance to Sentiment from the Augustans to the Romantics, Ed. Syndy McMillen Conger (Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1990).</ref> It was during this time that Wollstonecraft’s intellectual universe greatly expanded, not only from the reading that she did for her reviewing job but also from the company that she started keeping. She attended Johnson’s famous dinners and met such luminaries as Thomas Paine and William Godwin.

While in London, Wollstonecraft pursued a relationship with the artist Henry Fuseli, even though he was already married. She was enraptured by his genius, “the grandeur of his soul, that quickness of comprehension, and lovely sympathy.”<ref>Quoted in Todd, 153.</ref> She seems to have proposed a loose threesome arrangement but Fuseli’s wife was appalled and the affair, if it ever was one, was broken off.<ref>Todd, 197-8.</ref> After Fuseli’s rejection, Wollstonecraft decided to travel to France not only to escape the humiliation of the incident but also to participate in the exciting revolutionary events which she had just celebrated in her recent Vindication of the Rights of Men, a response to Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France, and more indirectly in her A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.

Throughout her life, Wollstonecraft was plagued by what was probably depression. Her letters to her sisters and close friends are not elegant and closely crafted missives (the more usual eighteenth-century style of letter-writing)—they are outpourings of emotion in which her agony and misery are clear. She frequently resolves to accept God’s punishment and is anxious for death to come.<ref>See, for example, Todd, 72-5.</ref>

[edit] France and Imlay

Wollstonecraft left for Paris in December of 1792; she arrived about a month before Louis XVI was guillotined—the country was in turmoil. She sought out other English visitors such as Helen Maria Williams and joined the circle of expatriates then in the city<ref>Todd, 214-5.</ref>. Having just written A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, Wollstonecraft seemed determined to put her ideas to the test. Mixing her ideas with those of the French Revolution, she attempted her most experimental romantic attachment yet. She met and fell passionately in love with Gilbert Imlay, an American adventurer.<ref>Todd, 232-235.</ref> Whether or not Wollstonecraft was interested in marriage, it seems clear from his letters that Imlay was not. Moreover, while Wollstonecraft had rejected the sexual component of relationships in A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, Imlay awakened her passions and her interest in sex.<ref>Todd, 235-6.</ref> Wollstonecraft became pregnant and on May 14, 1794, she gave birth to her first child, Fanny, naming her after her first and perhaps closest friend.

As the political situation worsened and England declared war on France, all English citizens were put at considerable risk. To protect Wollstonecraft, Imlay registered her as his wife in 1793 even though they were not married.<ref>Johnson, Claudia L., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft. New York: Cambridge University Press (2002), xviii. ISBN 0521789524</ref> Other of Wollstonecraft’s friends were not so lucky—they were arrested, like Thomas Paine, and some were even guillotined. After Wollstonecraft left France, she continued to refer to herself as “Mrs. Imlay” therefore granting some sort of legitimacy to her child.

Imlay, unhappy with the domesticated and maternal Wollstonecraft, eventually left her. He promised that he would return to Le Havre, France, where she went to give birth to her child, but his long delays in writing her and his long absences convinced the anxious and distraught Wollstonecraft that he had found another woman. Her letters to him are full of needy expostulations, explained by some critics as the expressions of a deeply depressed woman but perhaps understandable under the circumstances—she was alone with an infant in the middle of a revolution.<ref>Todd, Chapter 25.</ref>

[edit] England and Godwin

Wollstonecraft returned to London, seeking Imlay, in April of 1795 but he rejected her. In May of 1795 she attempted to commit suicide, probably with laudanum, but Imlay saved her life (it is unclear how).<ref>Todd, 286-7.</ref> In one last attempt to win back Imlay, she embarked upon some business negotiations for him in Scandinavia, trying to recoup some business losses that he had experienced. This difficult and hazardous trip Wollstonecraft undertook only with her young daughter and a maid. She recounted her thoughts in letters to Imlay, many of which were eventually published as Letters Written During a Short Residence in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark in 1796. When she returned to England and came to the full realization that her relationship with Imlay was over, she attempted to commit suicide for the second time. In a very deliberate manner, she went out on a rainy night and “to make her clothes heavy with water, she walked up and down about half an hour” and then jumped into the Thames but someone saw her jump and rescued her.<ref>Todd, 355-6.</ref> Wollstonecraft considered her suicide deeply rational, writing after rescue, “I have only to lament, that, when the bitterness of death was past, I was inhumanly brought back to life and misery. But a fixed determination is not to be baffled by disappointment; nor will I allow that to be a frantic attempt, which was one of the calmest acts of reason. In this respect, I am only accountable to myself. Did I care for what is termed reputation, it is by other circumstances that I should be dishonoured.”<ref>Quoted in Todd, 357.</ref>

Slowly, Wollstonecraft returned to her literary life, becoming involved with Joseph Johnson’s circle again and in particular with Mary Hays, Elizabeth Inchbald and Sarah Siddons through William Godwin. Godwin and Wollstonecraft’s unique courtship began apace, through letters, and eventually became a love affair. Once she became pregnant, though, they decided to marry so that their child would be legitimate. This event revealed that Wollstonecraft had never been married to Imlay and she and Godwin lost many friends as a result. After their marriage on March 29, 1797, they moved into two adjoining houses, so that they could both still retain their independence; they often communicated by letter.<ref>Todd, 417-424.</ref> By all accounts, theirs was a happy and stable relationship.

[edit] Death and Godwin’s Memoirs

On August 30, 1797, Wollstonecraft gave birth to her second daughter, Mary. Although the delivery seemed to go well initially, in fact, parts of the placenta were left inside Wollstonecraft and became infected. On September 10, she died of puerperal fever. Godwin was devastated; he wrote to a friend “I partook of a happiness, so much the more exquisite, as I had a short time before had no conception of it, and scarcely admitted the possibility of it.”<ref>Todd, 457.</ref> She was buried at Old Saint Pancras Churchyard and there is a memorial to her there (though both her and Godwin's remains were later moved to Bournemouth). Her tombstone reads, “Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin, Author of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman: Born 27 April, 1759: Died 10 September, 1797.”<ref>Todd, 457.</ref>

In January of 1798 Godwin published his Memoirs of the Author of a Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Although Godwin felt that he was portraying his wife with love, compassion and sincerity, many people were shocked at his revelations of Wollstonecraft’s illegitimate children, love affairs and suicide attempts. Robert Southey accused him of “the want of all feeling in stripping his dead wife naked.”<ref>Robert Southey to William Taylor, 1 July 1804, ‘’A Memoir of the Life and Writings of William Taylor of Norwich’’, Ed. J.W. Robberds, 2 vols. (London: John Murray, 1824):1:504.</ref>. In fashioning a picture of Wollstonecraft, Godwin recreates her as a woman deeply invested in feeling who was balanced by his reason and portrayed her as more of a religious skeptic than her other writings suggest that she was.

[edit] Works

[edit] Vindication of the Rights of Men (1790)

In 1790 Edmund Burke published Reflections on the Revolution in France. Burke, who had been a supporter of the American Revolution, shocked his contemporaries by arguing against the French revolutionaries. His book set off what is now known as the “Revolution Controversy,” a pamphlet war responding to Burke’s text. <ref>See, for example, Marilyn Butler, ed., Burke, Paine, Godwin, and the Revolution Controversy, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).</ref> Wollstonecraft’s Vindication of the Rights of Men was the first of many sallies in a war that included other such seminal works as Thomas Paine’s Rights of Man. But Wollstonecraft was not just responding to Burke’s Reflections, she was also responding to Burke’s A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (1756) in which, among other things, he argued that the beautiful was associated with weakness and femininity and that the sublime was associated with strength and masculinity. Wollstonecraft turns Burke’s rhetoric in the Reflections against him; she argues that his theatrical staging, such as the famous scene in which he describes the horrors Marie Antoinette had to undergo in florid and overblown prose, turn all of the citizens into weak women who are swayed by show..<ref>Mary Wollstonecraft, The Vindications: The Rights of Men and The Rights of Woman, Ed. D.L. Macdonald and Kathleen Scherf (Toronto: Broadview Literary Texts, 1997), 45.</ref> She also critiques Burke’s argument by focusing on class, demonstrating like many other critics of Burke, that he was only moved by Marie Antoinette’s suffering, but not by the plight of the poor, starving women in France. Wollstonecraft argues strongly for the use of reason rather than for Burke’s reliance on tradition in government; for example, under his system, she explains, we would be obligated to continue slavery because our ancestors held slaves.<ref>Macdonald, 44.</ref> Wollstonecraft does not reject the need for sympathy in human relations, she almost always makes the point that sympathy is insufficient for social cohesion (at one point she writes “Such misery demands more than tears–I pause to recollect myself” <ref>Macdonald, 96.</ref>)—one must always also analyze any situation rationally. Interestingly, though, she ends the Vindication of the Rights of Men with a reference to the Bible: “HE fears God and loves his fellow-creatures.—Behold the whole duty of man!”<ref>Macdonald, 95.</ref>

[edit] Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792)

A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (VRW) consists of a hybrid of genres, everything from a political treatise, to a conduct book, to an educational treatise. In order to discuss the position of women in society, Wollstonecraft outlines the connections between four terms: rights, reason, virtue, and duty. Importantly, rights and duties are integrally linked for Wollstonecraft - if one has civic rights, then one also has civic duties. As she succintly states, “without rights there cannot be any incumbent duties."<ref>Macdonald, 282.</ref>

One of the main lines of argument in VRW is that women should be educated, and educated rationally, so that they can make contributions to society. Wollstonecraft responds quite vitriolically to conduct-book writers such as James Fordyce and John Gregory and educational philosophers such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau who argue that a woman does not need a rational education. (Rousseau famously argues in Emile that women are educated for the pleasure of men.) She argues that wives should be the rational "companions" of their husbands<ref>Macdonald, 192.</ref> and that, perhaps even more importantly, if a society is leaving the education of its children to women, those women must be well-educated in order to pass on knowledge to the next generation. Wollstonecraft argues that women are silly and superficial (she refers to them, for example, as "spaniels" and "toys" at one point<ref>Macdonald, 144.</ref>) not because of an innate deficiency of mind but because men have denied them access to education. What Wollstonecraft is most intent on pointing out is the limitations that women's educations have placed on them. In a poetic phrase, she writes: “Taught from their infancy that beauty is woman’s sceptre, the mind shapes itself to the body, and, roaming round its gilt cage, only seeks to adorn its prison.”<ref>Macdonald, 157.</ref> The implication behind such a statement, of course, is that without the damaging ideology foisted upon young women at an early age that focused their attention on beauty and outward accomplishments, women could do much more.

It is debatable to what extent Wollstonecraft believed that women were equal to men in the modern sense. Certainly she was not a feminist in the modern sense of the word and she was not calling for equal rights or suffrage in her texts. But she does claim that all men and women are equal in the eyes of God that they are all subject to the same moral laws<ref> See, for example Macdonald, 126, 146.</ref> Such claims of equality, though, can be contrasted with her statements respecting the priority of masculine strength and valor.<ref>Macdonald, 110.</ref> Wollstonecraft famously and ambiguously states: "Let it not be concluded that I wish to invert the order of things; I have already granted, that, from the constitution of their bodies, men seem to be designed by Providence to attain a greater degree of virtue. I speak collectively of the whole sex; but I see not the shadow of a reason to conclude that their virtues should differ in respect to their nature. In fact, how can they, if virtue has only one eternal standard? I must therefore, if I reason consequentially, as strenuously maintain that they have the same simple direction, as that there is a God.”<ref>Macdonald, 135.</ref>

One of Wollstonecraft's most scathing criticisms in VRW is against false and excessive sensibility, particularly in women. She argues that women who succumb to sensibility are "blown about by every momentary gust of feeling"<ref>Macdonald, 177.</ref> and because they are "the prey of their senses" they cannot think rationally. In fact, she claims, they do harm not only to themselves but to the entire civilization. These are not women who can help refine a civilization (a popular eighteenth century idea) but women who will destory it. Wollstonecraft does not argue that reason and feeling should act independently of each other; she claims, rather, that they should inform each other. This is clear in her own writing style which becomes very passionate at times.

In addition to her larger philosophical arguments, Wollstonecraft lays out specific suggestions for an educational model. In Chapter 12, "On National Education," she argues that all children should be sent to a "country day school" but also given some education at home “to inspire a love of home and domestic pleasures." She also maintains that schooling should be co-educational, arguing that men and women, whose marriages are "the cement of society," should be "educated after the same model."

Wollstonecraft addressed her text to the middle-class, what she called the “most natural state.” In many ways, it is restricted by and encourages a bourgeois view of the world.<ref>See, for example, Gary Kelly, Revolutionary Feminism: The Mind and Career of Mary Wollstonecraft (London: Macmillan, 1992).</ref> She encourages modesty and industry and attacks the wealthy using the same language that she uses to accuse women of worthlessness. Yet, she is not exactly a friend to the poor. In her national plan for education, she suggests that, after the age of nine, the poor be separated from the rich and taught in another school.<ref>Wollstonecraft, Vindication of the Rights of Woman, 311.</ref>

[edit] Bibliography

• Thoughts on the Education of Daughters (1787)
• Mary: A Fiction (1788)
• Original Stories from Real Life (1788)
• Of the Importance of Religious Opinions (1788) (translation)
• The Female Reader (1789) (anthology)
• Young Grandison (1790) (translation)
• Elements of Morality (1790) (translation)
• A Vindication of the Rights of Men (1790)
• A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792)
• An Historical and Moral View of the French Revolution (1794)
• Letters Written during a Short Residence in Sweden, Norway and Denmark (1796)
• Contributions to Analytical Review (1788-1797) (published anonymously)
• The Cave of Fancy (1798, published posthumously)
• Maria, or The Wrongs of Woman (1798, published posthumously)
• Letters to Imlay (1798, published posthumously)
• Letters on the Management of Infants (1798, published posthumously)
• Lessons (1798, published posthumously)
• On Poetry and our Relish for the Beauties of Nature (1798, published posthumously)

[edit] Notes and references

<references/>

[edit] Further reading

• Brody, Miriam. "Mary Wollestonecraft: Sexuality and women's rights (1759-1797)", in Spender, Dale (ed.) Feminist theorists: Three centuries of key women thinkers, Pantheon 1983, pp. 40-59 ISBN 0-394-53438-7
• Conger, Syndy McMillen. Mary Wollstonecraft and the Language of Sensibility. Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1994.
• Falco, Maria J., ed. Feminist Interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft. University Park: Penn State Press, 1996.
• Flexner, Eleanor. Mary Wollstonecraft. New York: Penguin, 1972.
• Franklin, Caroline. Mary Wollstonecraft: A Literary Life. New York: Palgrave, 2004. 0-333-97252-X
• Godwin, William. Memoirs of the Author of a Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Eds. Pamela Clemit and Gina Luria Walker. Peterborough: Broadview Press Ltd., 2001.
• Gordon, Lyndall. Mary Wollstonecraft: a new genus. Little Brown London 2005.
• Jacobs, Diane. Her own woman. The life of Mary Wollstonecraft. Simon and Schuster New York 2000.
• Janes, R.M. "On the Reception of Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman." Journal of the History of Ideas 39 (1978): 293-302.
• Johnson, Claudia L. Equivocal Beings: Politics, Gender, and Sentimentality in the 1790s. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
• Kelly, Gary. Revolutionary Feminism: The Mind and Career of Mary Wollstonecraft. New York: St. Martin's, 1992.
• Nixon, Edna. Mary Wollstonecraft: Her Life and Times. London: J.M. Dent & Sons, 1971.
• Poovey, Mary. The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer: Ideology as Style in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley and Jane Austen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
• Sunstein, Emily. A Different Face: The Life of Mary Wollstonecraft. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.
• Taylor, Barbara. Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
• Tomalin, Claire. The Life and Death of May Wollstonecraft. Penguin, 1992.
• Wardle, Ralph M. Mary Wollstonecraft: A Critical Biography. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1966.
• Wollstonecraft, Mary. The Complete Works of Mary Wollstonecraft. Ed. Janet Todd and Marilyn Butler. 7 vols. London: William Pickering, 1989.
• Wollstonecraft, Mary. The Complete Letters of Mary Wollstonecraft. Ed. Janet Todd. New York: Penguin Books, 2003.

[edit] External links

• Short biography, picture, and 'Vindication' ebook at Bartleby.com
• Works by Mary Wollstonecraft at Project Gutenberg
• Memoirs of the Author of a Vindication of the Rights of Woman, by William Godwin, at Project Gutenberg
• A short biography at The History Guide
• Free digitally-voiced audiobook of Mary: A Fiction at Babblebooks.comast:Mary Wollstonecraft (feminismu)

bn:মেরি ওলস্টোনক্রাফট bs:Mary Wollstonecraft cs:Mary Wollstonecraftová de:Mary Wollstonecraft et:Mary Wollstonecraft es:Mary Wollstonecraft eo:Mary Wollstonecraft fa:مری ولستون‌کرافت fr:Mary Wollstonecraft ga:Mary Wollstonecraft hr:Mary Wollstonecraft is:Mary Wollstonecraft it:Mary Wollstonecraft he:מרי וולסטונקראפט jv:Mary Wollstonecraft nl:Mary Wollstonecraft ja:メアリ・ウルストンクラフト no:Mary Wollstonecraft nds:Mary Wollstonecraft pl:Mary Wollstonecraft pt:Mary Wollstonecraft ru:Годвин, Мэри scn:Mary Wollstonecraft simple:Mary Wollstonecraft sk:Mary Wollstonecraftová sl:Mary Wollstonecraft sr:Мери Вулстонкрафт fi:Mary Wollstonecraft sv:Mary Wollstonecraft tr:Mary Wollstonecraft zh:玛莉·渥斯顿克雷福特