Francais | English | Espanõl

Reverse discrimination

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Image:Wiki letter w.svg Please expand this article.
Further information might be found in a section of the talk page or at Requests for expansion.
Part of a series of articles on
Discrimination

Major forms
Racism
Sexism
Homophobia
Ageism
Antisemitism
Islamophobia
Ableism

Manifestations
Slavery · Racial profiling
Hate speech · Hate crime
Genocide · Ethnocide · Holocaust
Ethnic cleansing · Pogrom
Intolerance · Xenophobia
Religious intolerance/persecution

Movements
Discriminatory
Aryanism · Neo-Nazism
White/Black supremacy
Anti-discriminatory
Abolitionism
Women's/Universal suffrage
Civil rights · Gay rights

Issues
Gay marriage
Zimbabwe land reform
Darfur conflict

Policies
Discriminatory
Segregation:
Racial/Ethnic/Religious/Sexual
Apartheid · Isolationism
Japanese internment
Anti-discrminatory
Emancipation · Civil rights
Integration · Desegregation
Affirmative action · Racial quota
Reparations

Law
Discriminatory
Anti-miscegenation
Alien and Sedition Acts
Jim Crow laws · Black codes
Nuremberg Laws
Apartheid laws
Anti-discriminatory
Equal Rights Amendment
Civil Rights Act
(List article)

Specific forms
Anti-Arabism · Classism
Linguicism · Ethnocentrism
Nationalism · Triumphalism
Economic discrimination

Other topics
Eugenics · Racialism
Prejudice · Political correctness
Reverse discrimination

Reverse discrimination describes discriminatory policies or acts that benefit a historically socio-politically non-dominant group (typically women and minorities), at the expense of a historically socio-politically dominant group (typically men and majority races). Reverse discrimination is itself a form of discrimination.

Particularly in the U.S., the term is used to imply that under-qualified members of minority groups are being hired and promoted instead of more qualified members of majority groups. [1] [2] [3], [4], [5]

It is worth noting that in particular, racial quotas for collegiate admission were held to be unconstitutional in the United States, although non-quota race preferences are legal.

Many legal cases involving claims of "reverse discrimination" are settled before they go to court. [6]

Contents

[edit] Allegations of Reverse Discrimination

See also Regents of the University of California v. Bakke and Grutter v. Bollinger.

A more correct definition is: Reverse discrimination: A term used to describe the outcome of a racial or gender quota system where preference is given not on ability but on perceived minority status.

[edit] Criticism of the term itself

The term reverse discrimination has been criticized by advocates of Affirmative Action as casting such policies in a negative light, without due consideration of their aims.

The term is sometimes considered rhetorical, attempting to create a non-existent distinction within the broad problem of discrimination.

[edit] Notes

<references />

[edit] Further reading

  • Fred Pincus, Reverse Discrimination: Dismantling the Myth. Rienner: 2003.
  • Alice O'Connor, et al., The Multi-City Study of Urban Inequality: Evidence from Four Cities. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1999

[edit] External links

sv:omvänd diskriminering

Personal tools