Reverse discrimination
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reverse discrimination describes discriminatory policies or acts that benefit a historically socio-politically non-dominant group (typically women and minorities), at the expense of a historically socio-politically dominant group (typically men and majority races). Reverse discrimination is itself a form of discrimination.
Particularly in the U.S., the term is used to imply that under-qualified members of minority groups are being hired and promoted instead of more qualified members of majority groups. [1] [2] [3], [4], [5]
It is worth noting that in particular, racial quotas for collegiate admission were held to be unconstitutional in the United States, although non-quota race preferences are legal.
Many legal cases involving claims of "reverse discrimination" are settled before they go to court. [6]
Contents |
[edit] Allegations of Reverse Discrimination
See also Regents of the University of California v. Bakke and Grutter v. Bollinger.
A more correct definition is: Reverse discrimination: A term used to describe the outcome of a racial or gender quota system where preference is given not on ability but on perceived minority status.
[edit] Criticism of the term itself
The term reverse discrimination has been criticized by advocates of Affirmative Action as casting such policies in a negative light, without due consideration of their aims.
The term is sometimes considered rhetorical, attempting to create a non-existent distinction within the broad problem of discrimination.
[edit] Notes
<references />
[edit] Further reading
- Fred Pincus, Reverse Discrimination: Dismantling the Myth. Rienner: 2003.
- Alice O'Connor, et al., The Multi-City Study of Urban Inequality: Evidence from Four Cities. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1999

