Francais | English | Espanõl

Same-sex marriage in Washington

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Same-sex marriage
Performed nationwide in

Netherlands (2001)
Belgium (2003)
Spain (2005)
Canada (2005)
South Africa (2006)

Performed statewide in
Massachusetts, USA (2004)
Foreign same-sex marriage recognized in
Israel (2006)
Debate in other countries and regions

Aruba
Australia
Austria
China
Estonia
France
Ireland
Latvia
Lithuania
New Zealand
Portugal
Romania
Sweden
Taiwan
United Kingdom
United States:
  CA, CT, MD, NY, NJ, OR, WA

See also

Civil union
Registered partnership
Domestic partnership
Timeline of same-sex marriage
Listings by country

This box: view  talk  edit</div>

Same-sex marriage is not recognized in Washington state. A decision in two cases that were on appeal to the Washington Supreme Court could have made Washington the second U.S. state to recognize these unions. Oral arguments were heard on March 8, 2005, and in July, one of the justices indicated a ruling would very likely happen before the September primary election in the State. Several justices are up for re-election, and some had speculated the Court may have held off on its controversial ruling until after the elections. The 5-4 split decision was handed down on July 26, 2006, with the final decision to overturn the lower trial court rulings, effectively stating that the state legislature was within its Constitutional right to limit a privilege to opposite-sex couples only. The state's ban on same-sex marriage (the Defense of Marriage Act of 1998) is thus upheld, though the court did note that this ruling does not prevent the legislature from changing state law to allow same-sex marriage, and three majority justices in the case invited the state Legislature to take another look at the gay marriage ban's effect on same-sex couples.

Contents

[edit] Civil suits for same-sex marriage

[edit] Andersen case

  • March 8, 2004: Six same-sex couples, backed by Lambda Legal, file suit challenging the constitutionality of Washington's Defense of Marriage Act. The four constitutional claims are based on due process, privacy, equal protection, and gender equality.
  • August 4, 2004: King County Superior Court Judge William L. Downing issues an opinion in Andersen v. Sims that said the state has no rational basis for excluding same-sex couples from the rights and benefits of marriage. The decision concluded that the state law limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples violated sections of the constitution that required due process and equal protection of the laws. Full marriage was not required, but the opinion at least mandated the creation of a "civil union" status that gave all marriage rights and benefits. These requirements did not go into effect, however, because the opinion was stayed pending appeal to the Washington Supreme Court.

[edit] Castle case

  • April 1, 2004: Eleven same-sex couples, backed by the American Civil Liberties Union, file suit challenging Washington's laws that bar same-sex couples from marrying. It also seeks recognition of marriages performed legally in other jurisdictions.
  • September 7, 2004: Thurston County Superior Court Judge Richard D. Hicks issues an opinion in Castle v. State that said the state marriage laws violated the equal protection of privileges and immunities clause of the state constitution. The ruling was combined with the Andersen case on an appeal to the Washington Supreme Court.

[edit] Andersen v. King County

The two cases, Andersen v. Sims and Castle v. State, were consolidated for supreme court review. The consolidated case was named Andersen v. King County.

  • March 8, 2005: Oral arguments are heard by the Washington Supreme Court.
  • July 26, 2006: The Washington Supreme Court handed down its ruling (5-4 in favor of overturning the lower trial court rulings). The majority opinion focused on the constitutionality of the legislature's actions, which enacted the Defense of Marriage Act limiting the privileges of marriage to opposite-sex couples.
  • August 29, 2006: Lawyers for the same-sex couples filed their motion under Supreme Court rules that allow either side in a lawsuit to seek reconsideration of a decision. The Court could reject the motion, ask the state for a written response, reverse their decision, or agree to re-hear oral arguments. There is no timetable, and requests are rarely accepted.<ref>Turnbull, Lornet (2006). Second Look at Gay Marriage? The Seattle Times, August 30, 2006, accessed online: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003234852_reconsider30m.html.</ref>

[edit] References

<references/>

[edit] External links


Same-sex marriage in the United States Image:Flag of the United States.svg
Legalized: Massachusetts
Law proposed: Maine - New York - Rhode Island
Domestic partnerships permitted: California - Connecticut - District of Columbia - Hawaii - New Jersey - Maine - Vermont
Prohibited by constitutional amendment: Alabama - Alaska - Arkansas - Colorado - Georgia - Hawaii - Idaho - Kansas - Kentucky - Louisiana - Michigan - Mississippi - Missouri - Montana - Nebraska - Nevada - North Dakota - Ohio - Oklahoma - Oregon - South Carolina - South Dakota - Tennessee - Texas - Utah - Virginia - Wisconsin
Prohibited by statute: Arizona - Connecticut - Delaware - Florida - Illinois - Indiana - Iowa - Maryland - Minnesota - New Hampshire - North Carolina - Pennsylvania - Puerto Rico - Washington - West Virginia - Wyoming
Marriage undefined: New Mexico - New York - Rhode Island
Personal tools