Francais | English | Espanõl

Taniyama–Shimura theorem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

The Taniyama–Shimura theorem (also called the modularity theorem) establishes an important connection between arithmetic of elliptic curves over rational numbers and modular forms, analytic objects of the 19th century mathematics, which are certain periodic holomorphic functions investigated in number theory. Despite the name, which is a carry over from when it was the Taniyama–Shimura conjecture, it was proved for all elliptic curves over rationals whose conductor (see definition below) was not a multiple of 27 in the fundamental work of Andrew Wiles and of Andrew Wiles and Richard Taylor. The remaining cases (of elliptic curve not with semistable reduction) were computed by Christophe Breuil, Brian Conrad, Fred Diamond, and Richard Taylor.

The Taniyama–Shimura theorem is a very partial case of a much more general conjecture due to Robert Langlands. In the Langlands programme to every elliptic curve over a number field one can associate an automorphic form, which is a generalization of a modular function. The method of the proof of the Taniyama–Shimura theorem takes into account a very specific behaviour of rational numbers, and this method cannot be extended to elliptic curves over an arbitrary number field, thus, the general case of elliptic curves over number fields still remains a mystery.

[edit] Statement

The theorem states that any elliptic curve over Q can be obtained via a rational map with integer coefficients from the classical modular curve

X0(N)

for some integer N; this is a curve with integer coefficients with an explicit definition. This mapping is called a modular parametrization of level N. If N is the smallest integer for which such a parametrization can be found (which by the modularity theorem itself is now known to be a number called the conductor), then the parametrization may be defined in terms of a mapping generated by a particular kind of modular form of weight two and level N, a normalized newform with integer q-expansion, followed if need be by an isogeny.

From another point of view, given an elliptic curve E over Q we may define a corresponding L-series. The L-series is a Dirichlet series which we may write

<math>L(s, E) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{c_n}{n^s}.</math>

We can take the same coefficients, and use them to define a function in powers of q

<math>f(q, E) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty c_n q^n.</math>

If we make the substitution q = exp(2πiτ), then the series becomes a Fourier series, and so the coefficients are sometimes called "q-series coefficients", but other times "Fourier coefficients". The function obtained in this way, remarkably, is a cusp form of weight two and level N and is also an eigenform (an eigenvector of all Hecke operators); this is the Hasse-Weil conjecture, which follows from the modularity theorem.

Some modular forms of level two, in turn, correspond to holomorphic differentials for an elliptic curve. The Jacobian of the modular curve can (up to isogeny) be written as a product of irreducible abelian varieties, corresponding to Hecke eigenforms of weight 2. The 1-dimensional factors are elliptic curves (there can also be higher dimensional factors, so not all Hecke eigenforms correspond to rational elliptic curves). The curve we obtain by finding the corresponding cusp form, and then constructing a curve from it, is isogenous to the original curve (but not in general isomorphic to it).

[edit] History

An incorrect version of this theorem was first conjectured by Yutaka Taniyama in September 1955. With Goro Shimura he improved its rigor until 1957. Taniyama died in 1958. The conjecture was rediscovered by André Weil in 1967, who showed that it would follow from the (conjectured) functional equations for some twisted L-series of the elliptic curve; this was the first serious evidence that the conjecture might be true. In the 1970s it became associated with the Langlands program of unifying conjectures in mathematics.

It attracted considerable interest in the 1980s when Gerhard Frey suggested that the Taniyama–Shimura conjecture (as it was then called) implies Fermat's last theorem. He did this by attempting to show that any counterexample to Fermat's last theorem would give rise to a non-modular elliptic curve. Ken Ribet later proved this result. In 1995, Andrew Wiles, with the partial help of Richard Taylor proved the Taniyama–Shimura theorem for semistable elliptic curves, which was strong enough to yield a proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.

The full Taniyama–Shimura theorem was finally proved in 1999 by Breuil, Conrad, Diamond, and Taylor who, building on Wiles' work, incrementally chipped away at the remaining cases until the full result was proved.

Several theorems in number theory similar to Fermat's last theorem follow from the Taniyama–Shimura theorem. For example: no cube can be written as a sum of two coprime n-th powers, n ≥ 3. (The case n = 3 was already known by Euler.)

In March 1996 Wiles shared the Wolf Prize with Robert Langlands.

[edit] References

de:Taniyama-Shimura-Theorem es:Teorema de Taniyama-Shimura fr:Théorème de Taniyama-Shimura it:Teorema di Taniyama-Shimura he:משפט טניאמה-שימורה ja:谷山・志村の定理 pt:Conjectura de Shimura-Taniyama-Weil ru:Теорема Таниямы — Симуры fi:Taniyaman–Shimuran lause vi:Định lý Taniyama-Shimura zh:谷山-志村定理

Personal tools